Which of the following is not typically an intentional tort?

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards
From $24.99Unlock all

Get ready for your CISR Commercial Casualty I Exam. Study with multiple choice questions, gain insights with explanations and hints. Enhance your understanding and increase your chances of success!

Multiple Choice

Which of the following is not typically an intentional tort?

Explanation:
The main idea is separating intentional torts from negligence. An intentional tort involves doing something on purpose to cause harm or knowing that harm is substantially certain to result. Libel fits this, as publishing a false statement about someone is a deliberate act that harms reputation. Assault is about intentionally creating imminent fear of harmful or offensive contact, and battery is about intentional harmful or offensive contact itself. Negligence, by contrast, happens when someone fails to exercise reasonable care and harm follows, but there was no intent to cause that harm. Since it lacks the intentional element, negligence is not an intentional tort.

The main idea is separating intentional torts from negligence. An intentional tort involves doing something on purpose to cause harm or knowing that harm is substantially certain to result. Libel fits this, as publishing a false statement about someone is a deliberate act that harms reputation. Assault is about intentionally creating imminent fear of harmful or offensive contact, and battery is about intentional harmful or offensive contact itself. Negligence, by contrast, happens when someone fails to exercise reasonable care and harm follows, but there was no intent to cause that harm. Since it lacks the intentional element, negligence is not an intentional tort.

More Multiple Choice Questions
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy